P
ProofSchool

Sample report

What a teacher report actually looks like.

Five evidence streams combined into one composite score. Per-dimension AI scoring on three teaching artifacts. A narrative written in the calm, considered register of a senior principal — not a SaaS product, not a generic chatbot. Below is what your school management committee will read.

ProofSchool · Teacher Assessment Report

Academic Year 2026-27 · Term 1

Mrs. Lakshmi Narayanan

English · Class IX-A, IX-B · Generated 14 May 2026

Composite

82/100

Stable

Stream scores

Student

84

30%

Peer

79

20%

Self

81

15%

Principal

88

20%

Artifact

79

15%

Principal's summary

“A thoughtful, structured teacher in the middle of a clear growth trajectory.”

Mrs. Narayanan's Class IX English programme shows strong cross-stream alignment. Students describe her as clear, patient, and consistent — three traits that surfaced in 47 of 51 anonymous responses. Peers note her recent shift towards student-led discussion as the standout development this term, and her own reflection on the same pivot demonstrates the self-awareness SQAAF Domain 3 emphasises.

Her lesson plan on ‘Inferring tone in poetry’ scored highly on objective clarity and method variety — the AI evaluator specifically called out the differentiation scaffolds for quick finishers (extension activity) and slow learners (peer reading pairs). The assessment paper was the weakest of the three artifacts: heavy on recall questions (78%), light on application and evaluation. This is the clearest growth area this cycle.

Strengths

  • Patient, clear classroom communication (47/51 student mentions)
  • Strong differentiation in lesson planning — scaffolds for both ends of the ability range
  • Active CPD orientation — the reflective practice artifact shows genuine pedagogical insight

Growth areas

  • Bloom's distribution on her assessment paper — rebalance toward application and evaluation
  • Parent communication frequency was below the peer median this term (12 mentions in parent stream)
  • Considered moving from lecture-led to discussion-led delivery in Section IX-B specifically

AI-graded artifacts — dimension breakdown

Lesson plan

86/100

  • Objective clarity90
  • Engagement & variety84
  • Assessment alignment82
  • Differentiation92
  • Feasibility82

Assessment paper

68/100

  • Bloom's distribution52
  • Question variety70
  • Clarity86
  • Curriculum alignment78
  • Originality60

Reflective practice

83/100

  • Self-awareness88
  • Growth orientation80
  • Pedagogical insight82

This report is generated using ProofSchool's SQAAF-aligned assessment framework. Data and findings can be uploaded to the CBSE SQAAF Portal as supporting evidence for Domains 1, 3, and 7 of the school's annual self-assessment. ProofSchool is a SQAAF Implementation Partner providing technology and tooling for schools. It is not a CBSE-empanelled assessment agency; final SQAAF accreditation ratings are determined by CBSE-certified Peer Assessor Teams during external assessment.

What changes by grade

Three grade-band starter rubrics, three different reads.

The rubric, the stream weights, and the dimensions on each artifact shift by grade band — what makes a great primary teacher is not what makes a great Class XII Physics teacher.

Class III · Primary

Ms. Suganthi · Tamil

Primary rubric emphasises classroom warmth, daily reading practice, and parent communication frequency. AI artifact eval is lighter on lesson plans, heavier on reflective practice.

Stream weights · Student 35% · Peer 15% · Self 15% · Principal 20% · Artifact 15%

Class VIII · Secondary

Mr. Karthik · Mathematics

Secondary rubric emphasises method variety, differentiation, and assessment alignment. Bloom's distribution weighting on the assessment paper rubric is at its strictest.

Stream weights · Student 30% · Peer 20% · Self 15% · Principal 20% · Artifact 15%

Class XII · Higher Sec.

Mrs. Priya · Physics

Higher-secondary rubric emphasises board-exam alignment, originality of assessment design, and peer-assessed lesson observation. Self-reflection rigour is graded against subject-specific CPD norms.

Stream weights · Student 25% · Peer 25% · Self 15% · Principal 20% · Artifact 15%

Want to see a fully-rendered PDF for your own school?

Book a 30-minute onboarding call and we'll run a demo-cycle on your actual rubric — three real teachers, three real reports, in the field by next week.